We do not compare brands — we compare approaches. Agencies usually pick one of three, and each of them costs differently: in subscriptions or in hours.
14-day trial · Plans from €5 a month · yearly billing −20%
You will not find names here. The question is not which tool is better, but how many places your team has to keep open to get one job done.
One subscription for client feedback, another for uptime monitoring, a third for speed and SEO audits. Each works well in its own field. Together they are three invoices, three panels, three user lists and three places to look for history.
The client sends a screenshot by email or chat, and once a month somebody on the team walks through the pages manually. There is no subscription — the bill arrives in hours, and part of the checks simply never happen.
One line of script on the site, one panel and one invoice per workspace. Bug reports with their technical context, 14 monitoring and audit services, and the history of every project in one place.
The columns describe approaches, not specific products — we do not use competitors’ names.
The same bug, reported two ways. What separates them is how much a developer has to reconstruct before starting work.
The report reaches an inbox, but no task has been created — somebody has to do that by hand.
The developer starts with the fix, not with “which browser?”
The two left columns are approaches, not products. The right one is what is built in here.
| Criterion | Separate tools | By hand | Bugzio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bug reports | |||
| What the developer receives | Depends on the tool; technical context often lives in another system | A screenshot and a free-form description | Screenshot, console, network, URL, browser and steps in one record |
| Who may report | Often tied to the number of paid users | Anyone who can write an email | Unlimited reporters, free — the client creates no account |
| Languages for the reporter | Usually English | Whatever the team speaks | 6 languages in the widget and the panel |
| Monitoring and audits | |||
| Uptime, speed, SEO, security | Separate tools and separate subscriptions | Checked by hand, when somebody remembers | 14 services included in the same panel |
| Bug reports and monitoring history in one place | |||
| Commercially | |||
| Number of subscriptions | 3 or more | 0 (you pay in hours) | 1 |
| Pricing model | Often per user | Per hour worked | Per workspace; an extra panel user is €5 a month |
| White-label for the client | Usually only on the most expensive plan | Not applicable | On the Agency plan: widget, panel and your own domain |
| Setup | One per tool | Nothing to set up — and nothing to automate | One line of script, about 5 minutes |
The table scrolls sideways →
The Bugzio column shows our own plan limits; the full plan-by-plan breakdown is on the pricing page. The other two columns describe a typical situation, not a specific product.
Two cases where we would send you elsewhere ourselves.
If your team needs only product analytics, only load testing, or only error tracking with millions of events a day, a specialised tool will go deeper. We go wide — everything around one website in one place.
We do not have SOC 2 or ISO 27001 yet, and we are not promising them “soon”. What we do and do not have is written out in full on the security page
Free tools, no sign-up: enter a domain and see what our monitoring sees. Together with them our system has already run more than 48,000 automated checks.
A 14-day trial. The number of reporters is unlimited and free on every plan.
Plans from €5 a month · yearly billing −20%
Bugzio